a aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az

Перевод: alveolar

[прилагательное]
ячеистый; луночный; альвеолярный

Тезаурус:

1. The incisors are lost first, with the break up of the anterior part of the premaxilla, and then the molars are lost as the alveolar border becomes damaged.
2. Two positions are available in the Department of Respiratory Medicine to study gene activation in human alveolar macrophages.
3. Top, mandible with destruction of the ascending ramus and abundant algal growth along the inferior border of the mandible; middle right, premaxilla with decay and splitting of bone and splitting of incisors; middle left, a second premaxilla with more advanced decay leading to destruction of the bone surface; bottom left, the same specimen showing loss of alveolar bone; bottom right, palate showing loss of angles of teeth, chipping and breakage of the molars.
4. % mand molar loss: numbers of empty alveolar spaces in the mandibles compared with the numbers of teeth that should be present, which is given by empty alveolar spaces plus molars still present.
5. A. rooted vole molar showing chipping of edges and pitting and flaking of the enamel surface (25); B. enlargement of same (45); C. tip of lower incisor showing chipping of edges of enamel and pitting and flaking of the enamel surface (20); D. enlargement of same (75); E. shrew mandible showing pitting of bone surface near the alveolar border and flaking of the enamel surface of the teeth (40); F. enlargement of the anterior tooth (165); G. shaft of limb bone showing pitting and flaking of the surface (12); H. enlargement of same (112).
6. (a)-; (b) maxillary fragments; (c) - (d) zygomatic fragments; (e) - (g) alveolar fragments; (h) - (j) rodent mandibular fragments; (i) - (k) insectivore mandibular fragments.
7. Lacking the thin alveolar bone associated with rodent incisors, the inferior border of the mandible is rarely broken, but the anterior end of the mandible carrying the large procumbent incisors may be broken and most of the mandible destroyed (Fig. 3.14 L).
8. % isolated molars: the numbers of isolated molars in the sample (given in the appendix) compared with the numbers of empty alveolar spaces in the mandibles and maxillae from which the molars must have come.
9. A. vole molar from magpie assemblage showing slight chipping of occlusal edge (38); B. lemming molar from arctic fox assemblage with extensive chipping and some longitudinal splitting (25); C. rooted vole molar from coyote assemblage with extensive edge chipping along the occlusal surface (11); D. vole molar from red fox assemblage with single large chip removed from alveolar end of tooth (30); E. vole molar from red fox assemblage with chipping along the occlusal edge followed by digestion of the broken surfaces (56); F. enlargement of the same modification from coyote assemblage (75); G. cracking of a cricetid molar from bat-eared fox assemblage (26); H. enlargement of the same from Verreaux eagle owl assemblage (52).
10. % max. molar loss: numbers of empty alveolar spaces in the maxillae compared with the numbers of molars that should be present, which is given by the empty alveolar spaces plus the teeth still present in the maxillae.
11. On microtine molars the digestion in category 1 predators is restricted mainly to the occlusal corners of the salient angles of the teeth and does not penetrate below the alveolar margins.