h ha hb hc hd he hf hg hh hi hl hm ho hp hq hr hs ht hu hw hy hz

Перевод: heinous

[прилагательное]
гнусный; отвратительный; ужасный

Тезаурус:

1. Is it right that liability for the second most heinous crime in English law, which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment, should be satisfied by this relatively low grade of fault?
2. Evil in Germany was so heinous, so unmistakable in the late 1930s, that all the world would assuredly join forces to wipe it out.
3. Admittedly, the Model Penal Code does contain a list of circumstances which may amount to extreme indifference, which assists the courts and increases the predictability of verdicts in a way that Scots law does not, but the essence of both approaches is that there is no precise way of describing those non-intentional killings which are as heinous as intentional killings.
4. In March of the following year, when the feuding between the UDA and the UVF reached the point of tit-for-tat assassination, Paisley called on Protestants to withdraw all support from the paramilitaries and accused them of committing crimes "just as heinous and hellish as those of the IRA".
5. The label "murder", and the stigma thought to accompany it, should be reserved for the most heinous group of killings; there is a well-recognized offence of manslaughter beneath murder, and this should be used for offences where the culpability is significantly lower.
6. The third and fourth promise that the DUP "offers the firmest stand against all attempts to force Ulster down the Dublin road", while the fifth section calls for an all-out war against the IRA and the return of the death penalty as "the only suitable punishment for the heinous murders committed in our Province".
7. Neither an intention to cause serious injury nor recklessness as to death should be sufficient on its own, but together they restrict one another, producing a test which both satisfies the criterion of certainty and marks out some heinous but non-intended killings.
8. If the point of distinguishing murder from manslaughter is to mark out the most heinous group of killings for the extra stigma of a murder conviction, it can be argued that the "grievous bodily harm" rule draws the line too low.
9. In other words, does English criminal law pick out the most heinous forms of killing as murders and manslaughters, or are the boundaries frozen by tradition?
10. The reason for distinguishing between murder and manslaughter must be to identify and to label the most heinous killings as murder, and it has been questioned whether English law succeeds in this.
11. To classify all reckless killings as murder might be too broad, but the point remains that some reckless killings may be thought no less heinous than intentional killings.
12. The law must resort to some kind of moral and social evaluation of conduct if it is to identify and separate out the most heinous killings.
13. What purpose is served by such senseless and heinous acts?