t ta tb tc td te tg th ti tk tl tm tn to tp tr ts tt tu tv tw tx ty tz

Перевод: totalizer

[существительное]
суммирующее устройство; тотализатор

Тезаурус:

1. The individual is thus both totalizer and totalized, deftly uniting freedom with necessity.
2. The major question thus always remains unanswered in the Critique : every time that Sartre announces that he is about to proceed with the fundamental problem of how History can be a totalization without a totalizer, he turns back to a previous, more easily intelligible stage on the way.
3. For all his use of the model of the boxing match, Sartre has really got no further with the fundamental question of how there can be totalization without a totalizer.
4. In the second Critique Sartre seems remarkably equivocal with regard to his central question of how struggles which have no controlling totalizer or underlying structure of totalization can be intelligible.
5. Sartre's philosophical grounding of "History", therefore, foundered in the second volume when the logic of history inexorably brought him, not to totalization without a totalizer, but to the very reverse: the figure of Stalin and the conclusion that Stalinism had been indispensable for the development of socialism in the Soviet Union.
6. In the context of the negativity of this formulation, Sartre is obliged to pose once again the problem of whether there can be a totalization, without any independent totalizer or totalizing force such as the dialectic, or whether the structure of negation that he has described means that, as for Adorno or Bakhtin, history does not develop positively but, rather, negatively, and is therefore instead detotalizing:
7. If Sartre's argument depended on a logic of history as totalization but broke down when he could not combine the praxis of the individual with the general logic of "totalization without a totalizer" except through the proliferation of his own writing, Althusser, by contrast, exploited the possibility of history as a "process without a subject", a history characterized by radical breaks and discontinuities, distinct from each other and not totalizing.
8. The articulation of individual praxis with History stood or fell with the concept of history as totalization without a totalizer.
9. This strategy marks a structure of repetition in Sartre's text: each time he poses the question of how there can be totalization of History without a totalizer, he retreats to a more limited example whose unity is already evident, but which in the end only brings him back to the original question again.
10. In Sartre's terms, a totalization needs a totalizer.
11. (I, 817 - 18) Sartre arrives at what he calls "the real problem of History", that is how there can be totalization without a totalizer, only at the very end of Volume I. It is not until the next volume, however, that he intends to show how individual actions, separate multiplicities, make up " one human history, with one truth and one intelligibility" (I, 69).
12. Instead, at this point Sartre at last abandons all hope of proving History as a totalization without a totalizer.