d
da
db
dc
dd
de
df
dg
dh
di
dj
dk
dl
dm
dn
do
dp
dr
ds
dt
du
dw
dx
dy
dz
Перевод: decrement
[существительное] уменьшение; снижение; ослабление; успокоение; демпфирование; степень убыли; декремент
Тезаурус:
- It is certainly what would be expected if the latent inhibitor functions like a CS- but it could just as easily be a consequence of generalization decrement - adding another stimulus to the excitatory CS might modify the way in which the latter is perceived and thus reduce its ability to evoke the CR.
- That from the Reiss and Wagner study may imply only that, in their procedure, generalization decrement completely masks inhibitory effects; the result does not require us to deny the existence of the latter.
- Thus the interaction between these stimuli is just what would be expected from considerations of generalization decrement and is not that predicted by conditioned attention theory.
- If we accept (and the case has been argued in detail with respect to habituation; Chapter 2, pp. 50-;3) that the presentation of S2 modify the representation of S1 that is formed, then generalization decrement will ensure that little latent inhibition will be evident after S1 - S2 pre-exposure.
- In other words, considerations of generalization decrement give reason to expect an overshadowing effect in flavour-aversion experiments but not in the conditioned suppression experiments.
- If the two are perceived as being different in some way (and with compound, AB, pre-exposure the presence of B might interact with A at a sensory or perceptual level making it discriminably different from the A used in conditioning), then generalization decrement would occur and the transfer of latent inhibition would be incomplete.
- The role of generalization decrement in these experiments can be investigated by comparing the effects on excitatory responding of an added stimulus that has had little or no pre-exposure with those produced by a stimulus that has undergone latent inhibition training.
- And the notion of generalization decrement can also explain the effects of prior exposure to B alone if it is allowed that such training will make the B stimulus less effective and thus relatively unlikely to interfere with the perception of A when the two are presented in compound.
- Again, testing with a stimulus somewhat different from that used for pre-exposure produces generalization decrement both in habituation and in latent inhibition (e.g. Carlton and Vogel 1967; Siegel 1969; Dawley 1979).
- This decline is postulated to be a classically conditioned decrement, with the consistent absence of any effective event following the target stimulus being viewed as the US that supports the conditioning of inattention (see Lubow et al .
- Although these results are compatible with conditioned attention theory (and with Wagner's theory), Kaye et al , (1988 b ) prefer an explanation in terms of generalization decrement.
- Avoidance learning similarly shows a clear decrement (e.g. Gordon, McCracken, Dess-Beech, and Mowrer 1981) as do certain food-rewarded discrimination tasks (e.g. Chiszar and Spear 1969).
- Sharing a common modality may be enough to produce generalization decrement and thus, according to the account presented above, an overshadowing effect might be expected with these stimuli.
|